cactusinhabitat - logo
Echinopsis balansae
(K. Schumann) Anceschi & Magli 2013
Photograph Echinopsis balansae in habitat

2011, Bolivia, Santa Cruz

 

Surveys

2011, Bolivia, Santa Cruz, Santiago de Chiquitos, A&M 708 Show on map

Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
01-1110854
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
02-1110935
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
03-1110915
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
04-1110915
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
05-1110916
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
06-1110918
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
07-1110917
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
08-1110942
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
09-1120103
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
10-1120134

 

2011, Paraguay, Dept. Concepción, San Alfredo, A&M 734 Show on map

Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
11-1130175
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
12-1130176
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
13-1130180
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
14-1130179
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
15-1130189
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
16-1130190
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
17-1130182
Preview photo Echinopsis balansae
18-1130184

 

back to top

Synonyms

Cereus balansae*, Harrisia balansae, Cereus guelichii, Eriocereus guelichii, Harrisia guelichii
* Basionym

Distribution

Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul), Paraguay

Conservation status

(3)   Least Concern, LC

Comments

Echinopsis balansae (K. Schumann) Anceschi & Magli is a new combination published in cactusinhabitat booklet South America 2011-2013 (Anceschi & Magli 2013, 37). For the phylogenetic hypothesis adopted for the assimilation of Harrisia Britton in Echinopsis Zuccarini see booklet (ibid., 22-29). 
(June 2013)

For years, molecular analysis revealed the close relationship between Echinopsis s.l. and the other genera within the tribe Trichocereeae, or subtribe Trichocereinae (Nyffeler 2002, 317, 319; Schlumpberger 2009; Lendel et al. 2006, unpubl. data in Nyffeler & Eggli 2010). Even more recent molecular analysis of Echinopsis (Schlumpberger & Renner 2012), clearly demonstrated that a cladistically correct interpretation of the molecular data, in the direction of a monophyletic genus Echinopsis, leads to the assimilation in Echinopsis s.l., as currently conceived (Anderson 2001; Hunt et al. 2006; Anderson & Eggli 2011), of Cleistocactus Lemaire, Denmoza Britton & Rose, Haageocereus Backeberg, Harrisia Britton, Oreocereus (A. Berger) Riccobono, Weberbauerocereus Backeberg and 10 other genera of the Trichocereeae/Trichocereinae.
We've dealt extensively with the subject, in the part devoted to the taxonomy in our last booklet (Anceschi & Magli 2013b, 22-29). 
Our position is summarized in “The new monophyletic macro-genus Echinopsis. No risk of paraphyly, and the most convincing hypothesis in phylogenetic terms” appeared on Cactaceae Systematics Initiatives N° 31, pages 24-27 (August 2013).
The PDF of the Postprint is available here (PDF 168KB).
(February 2015)

Genus

Echinopsis

Other species

acanthura
acrantha
albispinosa
ancistrophora
angelesiae
aurea
balansae
baumannii
bertramiana
bridgesii
bruchii
buchtienii
bylesiana
calochlora
camarguensis
candelilla
candicans
caulescens
celsiana
cephalomacrostibas
chalaensis
chrysantha
chrysochete
cinnabarina
decumbens
ferox
formosa
guentheri
haematantha
haynei
hempeliana
hennigiana
horstii
huascha
hystrix
kieslingii
korethroides
laniceps
lateritia
leucantha
leucotricha
mamillosa
marsoneri
martinii
maytana
melanostele
micropetala
mirabilis
nothochilensis
nothohyalacantha
obrepanda
oxygona
pachanoi
pamparuizii
parviflora
pasacana
platinospina
pomanensis
pseudomelanostele
pugionacantha
quadratiumbonata
randallii
rauhii
rhodacantha
rojasii
rondoniana
rowleyi
samaipatana
santacruzensis
schickendantzii
sextoniana
smaragdiflora
spiniflora
stilowiana
strausii
strigosa
tacaquirensis
tarijensis
terscheckii
tetracantha
thelegona
thionantha
tominensis
trollii
urbis-regum
volliana
weberbaueri
werdermanniana